Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Part III: The Age of Accelerating Connections


Part 3: The Age of Accelerating Connections

For me, the development of Silk Roads, Sea Roads, and Sand Roads is extremely fascinating as this was the beginning of what greatly defines our world today. As mentioned in the text, these roads “linked peoples both economically and culturally, prompted the emergence of new states, and sustained elite privileges in many ancient civilizations…they resembled the globalized world of modern times (Strayer, 2013, pg. 342). It was through the Silk Roads (particularly during prosperous periods of time) when many particular goods were traded and sold for high prices due to their rareness in different cultures. Some of these products were: mirrors, gunpowder, paper, furs, livestock, herbal medicine, dyes, swords, artwork, and olive oil to name a few (pg. 320). These roads are responsible for the spread of cultural diversity all over the world. The text notes that Buddhism was a “cultural product of Indian civilization, spread widely throughout Central and East Asia, owing much to the activities of merchants along the Silk Roads. What I also found interesting about the various roads of transit was the spread of disease. As pointed out in the text, “Each of the major population centers of the Afro-Eurasian world had developed characteristic disease patterns, mechanisms for dealing with them, and in some cases immunity to them” (323). When comparing commerce prior to the 1500s to commerce today some of the main differences are: prior to the 1500s most people produced products mainly for their own consumption rather than for the market, “the world economy of the modern era increasingly had a single center which came to dominate much of the world both economically and politically…Economic relationships among third-wave civilizations were more balanced and multi-centered than those of the modern era” (Strayer, 2013, pg. 342).

            From 500-1300 C.E. China witnessed many changes in society. As pointed out in the text, Strayer believes these changes were due to internal factors and political conflicts within China. “The political conflicts of the “era of warring states” provided the setting and the motivation for the emergence of Confucianism and Daoism…The personal qualities and brutal policies of Shihuangdi played a role in China’s unification…and the subsequent creation of a widespread network of canals and waterways as well as the country’s technological achievements served to maintain that unity for a long period of time…The massive inequalities of Chinese society generated the peasant upheavals which periodically shattered that unity and led to new ruling dynasties” (Strayer, 2013, pg. 392). One aspect that I found particularly interesting was the relationship between China and Buddhism. It was the Silk Road that initially brought Buddhism into China, and it was initially only practiced by the merchants and monks living in China. “In half the millennium between roughly 300 and 800 C.E., Buddhism took solid root  in China within both elite and popular culture, becoming a permanent, through fluctuating, presence in Chinese life” (Strayer, 2013, pg. 389).

            When comparing the history of China to the history of Islam, one thing that stands out to me is the comparison of Islamic law to that of Chinese law and the effect that religion had on these countries. Both countries have strict rules and regulations that were created to keep order and deter anyone from rebelling against that order; however religion has had almost the opposite effect on each country. In China we had the birth of Buddhism which challenges laws and regulations. In Islam we have rules and regulations that are supported by the popular religion. Although Islam encompasses great diversity between the Sunni and Shia understandings of faith, both are in accordance with laws that are in place (although political opinions vary). It just amazes me how one single aspect of a country (such as religion) can change the course of a country within a limited amount of time.

No comments:

Post a Comment